Web site logical path: [www.psy.gla.ac.uk] [~steve] [ilig] [this page]
This page is an ad hoc bibliography of papers about EVS. I expect to paste in lists of references I come across without checking them: you use these at your own risk, but they could be a useful starting point. Please send in suggestions: great papers, useful papers, papers you have written, corrections to entries already here. Attached word documents or HTML is preferred (or I may not do the formatting). I will probably only include either published journal articles and books or reports on the web; and I may exclude anything without explanation.
A very few I have starred '**'. I think these are worth special attention.
See also Will Thalheimer's annotated bibliography. While mine is an uncritical heap to use as a starting point, his selects often cited ones AND provides some critical appraisal.
ABRAHAMSON, A.L. (1998) An Overview of Teaching and Learning
Research with Classroom Communication Systems. Paper presented at the
International Conference of the Teaching of Mathematics,
Samos, Greece.
ANDERSON, T., HOWE, C., SODEN. R., HALLIDAY, J. & LOW, J. (2001).
Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in
further education students. Instructional Science, 29, 1-32.
Angelo, T.A., and K.P. Cross (1993). Minute Paper. In Classroom
Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers, San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 148-153.
Annett, D. (1969): Feedback and Human Behaviour. New York,
Penguin.
** Banks,D.A. (ed.) (2006) Audience response systems in higher
education: Applications and cases (Information Science Publishing)
Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as
means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls.
Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 245-263.
Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., & Dufresne, R. J.
(2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system
teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 31-39.
N Beatty, I.D., Gerace, W.J., Leonard, W.KJ., Dufresne, R.J.,
Am. J. Phys xxx xxxx (2006)
Bjork, R. A., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1989). On the puzzling
relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C.
Izawa (Ed.) Current Issues in Cognitive Processes: The Tulane
Floweree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 313-344). Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Bligh, D. (2000), What’s the use of lectures? San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bloom’s Taxonomy : http://www.officeport.com/edu/blooms.htm
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the
Classification of Educational Goals — Handbook I: Cognitive
Domain New York: McKay.
Boyle, J.T. & Nicol, D.J. (2003) "Using classroom communication
systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings"
Association for Learning Technology Journal vol.11 no.3
pp.43-57
Bransford J. , Brophy S., Williams S. (2000) "When Computer
Technologies Meet the Learning Sciences - Issues and Opportunities"
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology Volume 21,
Number 1, January 2000, pp. 59-84
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How
people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.
C.: National Academy Press.
Brookfield, S. D. (1995), Becoming a critically reflective
teacher, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition
and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher. 18, 32-42.
Brumby, M.N. (1984), ‘Misconceptions about the concept of
natural selection by medical biology students’, Science
Education, 68(4), 493-503.
Bruner, J. (1985), ‘Vygotsky: a historical and conceptual
perspective’ in Wertsch, J.V. (ed), Culture, communication
and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burnstein, R. A. & Lederman, L. M. (2001). Using wireless keypads
in lecture classes. The Physics Teacher, vol.39 no.1 pp.8-11.
N CAL-laborate, UniServe Science International
Newsletter, 14 (2005) available online http://science.uniserve.edu.au/pubs/callab/vol14/cal14_bates.pdf
Carnaghan, C., & Webb, A. (2005). Investigating the effects of
group response systems on learning outcomes and satisfaction in
accounting education. Downloaded January 2007 from
www.learning.uwaterloo.ca/LIF/responsepad_june20051.pdf .
Carnaghan, C., & Webb, A. (2005). Investigating the effects of
group response systems on learning outcomes and satisfaction in
accounting education. Retrieved on January 1, 2007 from
www.learning.uwaterloo.ca/LIF/ responsepad_june20051.pdf
Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E. and Anderson, J. H. (1980). Factors
influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal
of Physics, 48, 1074-1079.
Chickering, Arthur W. and Gamson, Zelda F, Seven Principles for Good
Practice in Undergraduate Education -
http://aahebulletin.com/public/archive/sevenprinciples1987.asp
Christianson, R. G. & Fisher, K. M. (1999). Comparison of student
learning about diffusion and osmosis in constructivist and traditional
classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 21,
687-698.
Cohen, E.G. (1994), ‘Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for
productive small groups’, Review of Educational Research,
64(1), 3-35.
Comlekci, T., Boyle, J.T., King, W., Dempster, W., Lee, C.K.,
Hamilton, R. and Wheel, M.A. (1999), ‘New approaches in
mechanical engineering education at the University of Strathclyde in
Scotland: I — Use of Technology for interactive teaching’,
in Saglamer, G.(ed), Engineering Education in the Third
Millenium, Leuchtturm- Verlag.
Cristle, C. A., & Schuster, J. W. (2003). The effects of using
response cards on student participation, academic achievement, and
on-task behavior during whole-class math instruction. Journal of
Behavioral Education, 12(3), 147-165.
Crombie, W. J. (2006). Harvard launches wireless classroom.
Harvard University Gazette (February 23, 2006), Downloaded
February 2007 from
www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2006/02.23/05-eclassroom.html .
** Crouch, C.H. and Mazur, E. (2001), ‘Peer Instruction: Ten years
of experience and results’, American Journal of Physics,
69, 970-977
Crouch,C., A. Fagen, P. Callan & E. Mazur (2004) "Classroom
demonstrations: learning tools or entertainment" Am. J. Physics
vol.72 no.6 pp.835-838
Cutts,Q. Carbone,A., & van Haaster,K. (2004) "Using an Electronic
Voting System to Promote Active Reflection on Coursework Feedback" To
appear in Proc. of the Intnl. Conf. on Computers in Education
2004, Melbourne, Australia, Nov. 30th — Dec 3rd 2004.
Cutts,Q. Kennedy,G., Mitchell,C., & Draper,S.W. (2004)
"Maximising dialogue in lectures using group response systems"
Accepted for 7th IASTED Internat. Conf. on Computers and Advanced
Technology in Education, Hawaii, 16-18th August 2004
Cutts,Q.I. & Kennedy, G.E. (2005) "Connecting Learning
Environments Using Electronic Voting Systems" Seventh Australasian
Computer Education Conference, Newcastle, Australia. Conferences in
Research and Practice in Information Technology, Vol 42, Alison
Young and Denise Tolhurst (Eds)
Cutts,Q.I. & Kennedy,G.E. (2005) "The association between
students’ use of an electronic voting system and their learning
outcomes" Journal of Computer Assisted learning vol.21
pp.260–268
Davies, G. (1986). Context effects in episodic memory: A review.
Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 6, 157-174.
DeCorte, E. (1996), ‘New perspectives on learning and teaching
in higher education’, in Burgen, A. (ed.), Goals and purposes
of higher education, London: Jessica Kingsley.
DOISE, W & MUGNY, G. (1984). The social development of the
intellect. Oxford: Pergamon.
Dori, Y. J., & Belcher (2005). How does technology-enabled active
learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of
electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences,
14(2), 243-279.
Draper, S. W., Cargill, J. and Cutts, Q. (2002). Electronically
enhanced classroom interaction. Australian Journal of Educational
Technology, 18, 13-23.
Draper, S.W. (1998) "Niche-based success in CAL" Computers
and Education vol.30, pp.5-8
Draper,S.W. & Brown,M.I. (2004)
"Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system"
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning vol.20 pp.81-94
Draper,S.W., Brown, M.I., Henderson,F.P. & McAteer,E. (1996)
"Integrative evaluation: an emerging role for classroom studies of CAL"
Computers and Education vol.26 no.1-3, pp.17-32
Draper,S.W., Cargill,J., & Cutts,Q. (2002) Electronically
enhanced classroom interaction Australian journal of
educational technology vol.18 no.1 pp.13-23. [This paper gives the
arguments for interaction, and how EVS might be a worthwhile support
for that.]
Druckman, D., & Bjork, R. A. (1994). Learning, remembering,
believing: Enhancing human performance. Washington, D. C.:
National Academy Press.
** Dufresne, R.J., Gerace, W.J., Leonard, W.J.,
Mestre, J.P., & Wenk, L. (1996)
Classtalk: A Classroom Communication System for Active Learning
Journal of Computing in Higher Education vol.7 pp.3-47
http://umperg.physics.umass.edu/projects/ASKIT/classtalkPaper
Duncan, D. (2005). Clickers in the classroom: How to enhance
science teaching using classroom response systems. San Francisco:
Addison Wesley.
Duncan, D. (2005). Clickers in the classroom: How to enhance
science teaching using classroom response systems. San Francisco:
Addison-Wesley.
Eich, J. E. (1980). The cue dependent nature of
state dependent retrieval. Memory and Cognition, 8, 157-173.
Educational Technologies at Missouri, University of Missouri,
Introducing Student Response Systems at MU
http://etatmo.missouri.edu/toolbox/doconline/SRS.pdf
Edwards, H., Smith, B.A. and Webb, G. (2001), Lecturing: Case
studies, experience and practice, London: Kogan Page.
N El Rady, J., Innovate, 2(4) 2006. Available online at
http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=171
Elliott, C. (2003) Using a personal response system in economics
teaching. International Review of Economics Education.
Accessed 11 Nov 2004
http://www.economics.ltsn.ac.uk/iree/i1/elliott.htm
Elliott,C. (2001)
"Case Study: Economics Lectures Using a Personal Response System"
http://www.economics.ltsn.ac.uk/showcase/elliott_prs.htm
Fjermestad, J., & Hiltz, S. R. (2001). Group support systems: A
descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. Journal of
Management Information Systems (JMIS) vol.17 no.3 pp.115-160
Frey, Barbara A. and Wilson, Daniel H. (2004) Student Response
Systems, Teaching, Learning, and Technology: Low Threshold Applications -
http://jade.mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/lta/archives/lta37.php
Gardner, R., Heward, W. L., & Grossi, T. A. (1994). Effects of
response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A
systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class
science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27,
63-71.
Glaser, R. (1990), ‘The re-emergence of learning theory within
instructional research’, American Psychologist, 45(1),
29-39.
Godden, D. R., and Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context dependency in two
natural environments: on land and underwater. British Journal of
Psychology, 91, 99-104.
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2002). Looking in classrooms
(9th edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Guthrie, R. W., & Carlin, A. (2004). Using technology to engage
passive listeners. The International Principal, vol.8 no.2
N Hake, R. Conservation Ecology, 5, 28 (2002)
** Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional
methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics data for
introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66,
64-74.
N Hake, R.R. Am. J. Phys. 66, 64-72 (1998)
Hake,R.R. (1991)
"My Conversion To The Arons-Advocated Method Of Science Education"
Teaching Education vol.3 no.2 pp.109-111
online pdf copy
Halloun, I.A. and Hestenes, D. (1985), ‘The initial knowledge
state of college physics students’, American Journal of
Physics, 53, 1043-1055.
Hansen, E. J. (1998). Creating teachable moments…and making them
last. Innovative Higher Education, 23(1), 7-26.
N Hestenes, D. Am. J. Phys., vol.66, 465-7 (1998)
N Hestenes, D. and Wells, M. Phys. Teach. 30, 141-158 (1992)
N Hestenes, D., Wells, M., Swackhamer, G. Phys. Teach. 30, 159-166 (1992)
Horowitz,H.M. (2003)
"Adding more power to powerpoint using audience response technology"
http://www.socratec.com/FrontPage/Web_Pages/study.htm
Horowitz. H. M. (1998). Student response systems: Interactivity in a
classroom environment. Proceedings of Sixth Annual Conference on
Interactive Instruction Delivery. Society for Applied Learning
Technology, 8-15. This article has been updated in 2003 with a
new title, Adding more power to PowerPoint using audience response
technology, available at:
www.audienceresponseinfo.com/audienceresponse-info/power-to-powerpoint.html
Howe, C. J. (1991) "Explanatory concepts in physics: towards a
principled evaluation of teaching materials"
Computers and Education vol.17 no.1 pp.73-80
Hunt, D. (1982)
"Effects of human self-assessment responding on learning"
Journal of Applied Psychology vol.67 pp.75-82.
Inverno, R. "Making Lectures Interactive", MSOR Connections
Feb 2003, Vol.3, No.1 pp.18-19
Irving,A., M. Read, A. Hunt & S. Knight (2000)
Use of information technology in exam revision
Proc. 4th International CAA Conference
Loughborough, UK
http://www.lboro.ac.uk/service/fi/flicaa/conf2000/pdfs/readm.pdf
N Joe Redish at http://www.physics.umd.edu/perg/role/PIProbs/ProbSubjs.htm
See the collection of Peer Instruction questions maintained by
Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2006). Audience response systems:
Insipid contrivances or inspiring tools? In David A. Banks (Ed.)
Audience Response Systems in HigherEducation: Applications and
Cases (pp. 26-39).
Kearney, M. (2002). Description of Predict-observe-explain
strategy supported by the use of multimedia. Retrieved April 8,
2004, from Learning Designs Web site:
http://www.learningdesigns.uow.edu.au/exemplars/info/LD44/
Kellum, K. K., Carr, J. E., & Dozier, C. L. (2001). Response-card
instruction and student learning in a college classroom. Teaching
of Psychology, 28(2), 101-104.
Klaas and Baggely, 2003 The International Review of Research in Open
and Distance Learning,†Vol 4, No 2 (2003), † ISSN:
1492-3831 Accessed online 26th September 2007 at:
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/138/218
Kohn, A. (1999). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars,
incentive plans, A's, praise, and other bribes. Boston: Houghton
Mifflin.
Kolb, D. A. (1984): Experiential Learning: Experience as the
source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ,
Prentice Hall.
Kolikant, Y., McKenna, A., & Yalvac, B. (2005) "Using the
personal response system as a cultural bridge from silent absorption
to active participation" in Kommers, P., & Richards, G. (Eds.),
Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia,
Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2005 (pp. 2660-2667)
Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Kourilsky, M. L., & Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Generative teaching:
An enhancement strategy for the learning of economics in cooperative
groups. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 861-876.
Langer, E. J. (1997). The power of mindful learning. Reading,
MA: Addison-Wesley.
Langer, E. J. (2001). Mindful Learning. Current Directions in
Psychological Science, 9, 220-223.
Laurillard, D. (1993), Rethinking university teaching, London:
Routledge.
LAVE, J & WENGER, E (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate
peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ledlow, Susan, 2001, Center for Learning and Teaching Excellence
http://clte.asu.edu/active/lesspre.htm
Liu, T. C., Liang, J. K., Wang, H. Y., Chan, T. W., & Wei, L. H.
(2003). Embedding EduClick in Classroom to Enhance Interaction. In
Proceedings of International Conference on Computers in Education
(ICCE) pp.117-125.
Liu, Y. (2003). Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of
websites. Journal of Advertising Research vol.43 no.2 pp.207-218.
MacGregor, J., Cooper, J.L., Smith, K.A. and Robinson, P. (2000),
Strategies for energizing large classes: From small groups to
learning communities, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
MacManaway,M.A. (1968) "Using lecture scripts"
Universities Quarterly vol.22 no.June pp.327-336
MacManaway,M.A. (1970)
"Teaching methods in HE -- innovation and research"
Universities Quarterly vol.24 no.3 pp.321-329
Marmolejo, E. K., Wilder, D. A., & Bradley, L. (2004). A
preliminary analysis of the effects of response cards on student
performance and participation in an upper division university course.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 405-410.
Marton, F., and Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative
differences in learning: I — outcome and process. British
Journal of Educational Psychology, 46,4-11.
Matthews, R.S. (1996), ‘Collaborative Learning: creating
knowledge with students’, in Menges, M., Weimer, M. and
Associates. Teaching on solid ground, San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass,
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive
constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material
results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology,
93, 187-198.
Mayes, T. (2001), ‘Learning technology and learning
relationships’, in J. Stephenson (ed), Teaching and learning
online, London: Kogan Page.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual.
Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
McBeath, R. J. ed. (1992) Instructing and Evaluating Higher
Education: A Guidebook for Planning Learning Outcomes. New
Jersey: ETP.
McCabe et al. (2001) The Integration of Group Response Systems into
Teaching, 5 th International CAA Conference,
http://www.lboro.ac.uk/service/fi/flicaa/conf2001/pdfs/d2.pdf
N McDermott, L. Am. J. Phys. 61, 295-298 (1993).
McDermott, L.C. (1984), ‘Research on conceptual understanding in
mechanics’, Physics Today, 37 (7) 24-32.
Meltzer,D.E. & Manivannan,K. (1996)
"Promoting interactivity in physics lecture classes"
The physics teacher vol.34 no.2 p.72-76
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in
multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the
design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 92, 117-125.
Narayan, J. S., Heward, W. L., Gardner, R., Courson, F. H., &
Omness, C. K. (1990). Using response cards to increase student
participation in an elementary classroom. Journal of Applied
Behavior Analysis, 23, 483-490.
Nicol, D. J. & Boyle, J. T. (2003) "Peer Instruction versus
Class-wide Discussion in large classes: a comparison of two
interaction methods in the wired classroom" Studies in Higher
Education vol.28 no.4 pp.457-473
Novak,G.M., Gavrin,A.D., Christian,W. & Patterson,E.T. (1999)
Just-in-time teaching: Blending Active Learning and Web Technology
(Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall)
Novak,G.M., Gavrin,A.D., Christian,W. & Patterson,E.T. (1999)
http://www.jitt.org/ Just in Time Teaching (visited 20 Feb
2005)
Palinscar, A.S. (1998), "Social constructivist perspectives on
teaching and learning", Annual Review of Psychology, 49,
345-375. To be published in: Association for Learning Technology
Journal (ALT-J), 2003, 11(3), 43-57.
Panetta, K.D., Dornbush, C. and Loomis, C. (2002), "A
collaborative learning methodology for enhanced comprehension using
TEAMThink" Journal of Engineering Education, 223-229.
Paschal, C. B. (2002). Formative assessment in physiology teaching
using a wireless classroom communication system. Advances in
Physiology Education, 26(4), 299-308.
Philipp, Sven and Schmidt, Hilary (2004) Optimizing learning and
retention through interactive lecturing: Using the Audience Response
System (ARS) at CUMC,
http://library.cpmc.columbia.edu/cere/web/facultyDev/ARS_handout_2004_overview.pdf
Pickford, R. and Clothier, H. (2003) "Ask the Audience: A simple
teaching method to improve the learning experince in large lectures",
Proceedings of the Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Databases
conference, LTSN ICS.
** Poulis, J., Massen, C., Robens, E. and Gilbert, M. (1998). Physics
lecturing with audience paced feedback. American Journal of
Physics, 66, 439-441.
N Raine, D. Physics World, December 2000
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/13/12/2/1
REITER, S. N. (1994). Teaching dialogically: its relationship to
critical thinking in college students. In P. R. PINTRICH, D. R. BROWN
& C. E. WEINSTEIN (eds). Student motivation, cognition and
learning. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.
RESNICK, L.B. (1989). Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in
honour of Robert Glaser. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale,
New Jersey.
Resnick,L.B. (1989) "Introduction" ch.1 pp.1-24 in L.B.Resnick (Ed.)
Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser
(Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
Roediger, H. L., III, & Guynn, M. J. (1996). Retrieval processes.
In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 197-236).
San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Roschelle,J., Penuel,W.R. & Abrahamson,L. (2004) "Classroom
Response and Communication Systems: Research Review and Theory"
American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April
2004 http://ubiqcomputing.org/CATAALYST_AERA_Proposal.pdf
Roselli, R.J. and Brophy, S.P. (2002) "Exploring an
electronic polling system for the assessment of student progress in
two biomedical engineering courses " Proceedings of the American
Society for Engineering Education (CD-ROM DEStech Publications)
Session 2609 http://www.vanth.org/docs/008_2002.pdf
Rothkopf, E. Z. (1965). Some theoretical and experimental approaches
to problems in written instruction. In J. D. Krumboltz (Ed.).
Learning and the education process (pp. 193-221). Chicago:
Rand McNally.
Rothkopf, E. Z. (1966). Learning from written instructive materials:
An exploration of the control of inspection behavior by test-like
events.