Web site logical path:
[www.psy.gla.ac.uk]
[~steve]
[myNewWave]
[this page]
Pages linked to this one:
[myNewWave dir]
[posPsy general]
[my lobby]
[BMJ / Public health
approaches to mental illness]
It's not an established and defined area nor academic discipline, and so is not in any phone directory. You need networking and contacts. This page is my personal node for this, largely about and for Glasgow-based people.
One general argument (only one of the possible ones) implies that this IS an area, whether it has a name or not:
In fact, moreover, the WHO definition of health has always been (since WHO's founding in 1946): "Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity." Thus, for this "area" even to count as being about health, must deal with physical and social issues, not only psychiatric i.e. "mental" ones.
If we feel like using the tag "mmmHealth", then "m" stands for all of:
But CompSci use "pervasive health"; and some medics use "e-health".
Thus while the disease model divides the population into two parts, sick and healthy; the PosPsy view might be taken to divide the population into three: the sick, the normally unhappy, and those with good well-being. A possible argument is that PosPsy operates in and on the second gap, and that it is largely the re-invention of methods for a secular society that will again restore high well-being, but not raise it above those of highly spiritual people.
A2. Similarly, in considering what samples of people to study, consider samples of all these groups for a given pathology:
A3. Another facet of the same issue is whether to "pathologise" the condition, apply a simplistic medical model to the condition, .. i.e label it as abnormal, less than zero. Issues can be framed (or reframed) as one of these:
But part of this is whether to separate pathologising (recognising a problem as a problem, a pathology) from the distinct question of who is responsible for (and in control of) the solution. Recognising (admitting to yourself) that you have a problem and what its nature is, is not necessarily identical to having control taken away from you. You can't take control of your own issue until you admit to yourself you have one. Then the control issue (see also [B] below) would be about ...
Lucy Gunatillake worked on
Ginsberg in the past.
She has just completed an MSc project, which I supervised, on whether people's
feelings for their personal device affect how effective mHealth-related apps
on it are. (Yes, they can. App designers need to take this into account.)
Cara Wilson (←) has just completed
an MSc project (which I supervised) that showed that an app delivering CBT
(Cognitive Behavioural Therapy) with proven effectiveness for patients also
significantly increases well-being in non-clinical users.
She is now moving to postgraduate work at
QUT
(Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia) with
Margot
Brereton (→);
although she is interested in staying in touch.
(Requests for the report to: carawilson21 AT gmail.com)
He has recently been working on the topic of suicide interventions; and has
been accepted for a clinical psychology doctorate at Exeter University.
Mel McKendrick lives in Glasgow, works in Edinburgh.
Her main connection to this page is that in the past, she founded and ran a
support group for the families of the mentally ill, and started research in
this area before switching PhD topics.
Action
on depression.
Mark Charters has experience with mental health first aid
(and shares an office with a mad woman, or so she says).
Cindy Gray (staff page)
ffit project (football fans in training)
Carol Craig's
Centre for
confidence and well-being in Glasgow
Esther Papies
works the School of Psychology, in the field of Health Psychology,
particularly in connection with cognitions around eating behaviour.
Her Healthy Cognition Lab.
Chris Williams.
His websites:
Five Areas ltd.
Living life to the full
Michael Smith
profile 2
Rory O'Connor.
#rory
In this mHealth area, there are two:
Both these are even safer than aspirin, penicillin and valium; and are
continually being shown to be effective for ever more different problems.
Consequently, they are more and more attractive to employ:
If they don't do you good for one thing, they will for another.
This of course is a relevant perspective for framing projects and contains
the crucial distinction between a project on the user interface's issues
and one on the end effect on users.
Amy McDonald is the chief person in
Headtorch: e-learning training
for improving attitudes and behaviour at work towards mental health.
Web site logical path:
[www.psy.gla.ac.uk]
[~steve]
[myNewWave]
[this page]
Academic subjects
There is not a single discipline for this area. Here are a few academic areas,
each with their own angle on it, which you could check out. For these, you can
follow links to people or sites to explore further.
Computer Science (gadgets for this area)
John Rooksby.
Blog
Eurofit project (Social
innovation to improve physical activity and sedentary behaviour through elite
European football. His part is about the app.s)
Digital health, CSCW, mobile technologies, ...
Well-being, Positive Psychology, and the Institute for Health and
Well-being
Video
Phil Hanlon's
Society, Health,
and well-being "Afternow" website
Starter video
Papers
Positive psychology; and academic courses on it
Positive psychology is a (or is a wannabe) sub-area of academic psychology.
There are a few university courses on it (and doubtless more arriving).
Medicine
Mental health and wellbeing research group
Suicidal behaviour research lab
His Integrated Motivational-Volitional (IMV) Model of Suicidal Behaviour
His 11 minute video introducing the IMV model.
The staple cures.
Forty years ago, a friend of mine training to be a GP remarked that all
he really needed to know about was:
Aspirin, Penicillin, and Valium. These were interventions that were
effective, and each addressed a wide range of common problems.
NHS, university services, volunteer organisations
The NHS, university services, volunteer organisations etc.
have not been slow in starting to look at this area .... Titles: possible titles for this area and web page
Public approaches to well-being
Mental improvement for all
New mass approaches to health and well-being
The nameless area
Mass strategies for coping
Mind improvements (solo and social; medical and hobbyist; community and
professional)
New tactics for mass health
Mass, mobile, mental well-being.
Misc. links: still to be placed somewhere in the above sections
However it compared GP treatment for depression with that plus one of two
CCBT apps: so it doesn't address the effectiveness of an app alone which might
save resources by not involving a qualified human in the treatment.
It also doesn't show any preference by patients for a human contact, since all
had to use the human contact.
Gilbody,S. et al. (2015) "Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as
treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic
randomised controlled trial"
BMJ doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5627
See also her new book:
Reclaiming Conversation Sherry Turkle (2015) (Penguin Press)
review / interview
'To get to this point, independent trials will be needed to establish the
efficiency of each one. "We need to know what the benefits are of the apps and
devices," says Lowe, who wants an app-testing equivalent to the randomised
clinical trials used to assess drugs.'
[ignoring the writer's mistake, where she meant 'efficacy']
Student projects contributing
Horizontal menus
More refs: to ESRC, EPSRC programmes, more NHS ...
[Top of this page]