Last changed
26 March 2016 ............... Length about 1,000 words (13,000 bytes). (Document started on 3 Mar 2014.)
This is a WWW document maintained by
Steve Draper, installed at http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/courses/cereTwitter.html.
You may copy it.
How to refer to it.
This year (2014) I'm trying out a Twitter channel as a part of the
CERE course.
(This was inspired by a talk by Graeme Pate, and
my ideas on this in general will appear eventually
on this page.)
The Twitter Hashtag for this channel / course appeared on the course Moodle
page (we don't really want people not on the course using it).
As explained in the first session, to participate in the lectures:
What struck me most was the differing goals of the institution,
staff, and students in the HE learning environment. #cere14
2014-03-06 01:54:32
That spreadsheet, re-sorted by author so that you can easily pick out
your own (perhaps you want to copy/paste them into some document of your own).
You can "mine" the tweets in different ways, by sorting the spreadsheet
in different ways e.g. in chronological order, in reverse; by author or by
time.
Periodically we'll post up all tweets so far, in and out of class
(posted in Moodle)
Following Graeme, we can crudely classify contributions (tweets) into 3
classes, as in this table.
There are 27 students enrolled.
The table shows student contributions; Sarah added about as many again.
Period
Staff tweets
Student tweeters
Hallos
Total student tweets with content
Q&A
Links, refs
Comments, re-expressions
Session 1
1
11
11
9
2
3
4
Gap
4
1
0
2
1
0
0
Session 2
7
5
1
6
3
1
2
Gap
9
8
0
17
2
0
15
Session 3
7
1
0
2
0
0
2
Gap
0
1
0
0?
1
0
0
Session 4
10
0
1
0
0
0
0
Gap
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Session 5
7
3
1
3
0
3
0
Total up to end of last class
46
18 (of 27)
14
39
9
7
23
CERE16 and Tweetchat trial
This year,
Sarah Honeychurch
offered to lead a one-hour sync Tweetchat #CERE16 with my class,
in the week after CERE lectures ended with the aims:
Try to give them a CI type experience as a flavour of how well it worked
for SLH with the Rhizo MOOCs.
And as a demo of the CI ("Constructive Interaction") type of peer
discussion, discussed in the course
(see Miyake, 1986).
Her setup web page (to which I directed them) was:
here.
Only 1 of the 16 enrolled students participated. A record is:
here.
My pedagogical analysis of this failure
Good conversations need careful setting up, as the literature long ago made
clear. In two ways probably:
Scaffolding: easing new users into the practices with lots of
support. Sarah's plan here was to invite experienced friends, but this alone
wasn't quite enough in this case. This idea is pure Vygotsky / Jean Lave's
legitimate peripheral participation. The newbies do bits, but could never
hold it together into a coherent and functional whole without the more
experienced holding it together.
Catalysis. To get discussion going needs a "seed" or catalyst which
provokes discussion. With old friends, who meet and chat regularly, this
isn't so noticeable as they don't care if intellectually productive
conversation happens all the time; but when someone mentions the right kind of
thing, then it fires up. This is why (I speculate) that Timmons (??) found
that skill at critical thinking in students depends on whom they live with.
It is left to accident, but happens enough to make a serious difference over a
year or 4 years.
In contriving CI as experimentalists have done, requires careful design of a
catalyst: a topic of discussion. Miyake did it with pilot studies, till she
found a topic that worked on all her participants. Christine Howe not only
had a topic (and a topic statement) but also contrived to have pairs of
people who definitely differed in their views of it and and them
"commit" to their view in advance so that they noticed that what the other
person said was different to their view.
I had just worked this out explicitly in thinking over a partially
successful student project in this area, but failed to apply my own theory to
this project.
Fix the Doh: audio, popup but small IMG, clickable.
Technical / tool links about Twitter
Creating a Twitter account
here in advance.
You may want to, and encourage students to, create a nw twitter account if
they want to keep their class persona separate from other twitter interactions
they have.
You can use Storify (see below) to mine and create a web page, showing a
conversation in chronological order. Particularly useful for saving a
history: otherwise the tweets disappear like rubbish in a corporation tip, so
that they are too hard to find again.
Storify. There is a tool
"Storify"
which helps create a single web page that documents a whole Twitchat.
It shows it in chronological order (whilst Twitter normally shows tweets in
the reverse order, newest first).
CERE14CERE16
Work-rounds for char-limit on length of tweets
Send a URL with a longer msg in.
E.g. having a google doc open; put long answers in there; and send link to it
a a tweet.
The app that turns text into an IMG (which you can tweet).
Troubles I have getting going on Twitter
Have to be fluent to have a conversation
Follow a few people; get used to (reading) the style;
(only) occasionally contribute.
Train and be ready with tools to allow long tweets. See below.
E.g. having a google doc open; put long answers in there; and
send link to it a a tweet.
All my ideas for utterances are too long; no skill ready to hand for
short interjections
Replying didn't go to the hashtag; so didn't work as a forum contribution
but as a whisper in a corner.
A lot of trouble with the Twitter account. It kept wanting a confirmation
but not accepting it but not saying it wasn't accepting it.